Appendices

Supplementary material for: Meier et al. (2022)

• Supplementary Fig. S1. – Second year performance in terms of leaf area and leaf dry mass of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Fig. S2. – Second year performance in terms of LDMC and C/N ratio of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Fig. S3. – First year performance in terms of above-ground biomass and plant height of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Fig. S4. – First year performance in terms of of SLA and LNC of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Fig. S5. – First year performance in terms of the leaf area and leaf dry mass of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Fig. S6. – First year performance in terms of LDMC and C/N ratio of Bromus erectus in combination with Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa.
• Supplementary Table S1. – First year and second year performance in terms of above-ground biomass of Bromus erectus, Brachypodium pinnatum, Stipa capillata and S. tirsa in the different nutrient conditions and clipping treatments.
• Supplementary Table S2. – Results of the three-way ANOVA of leaf area, leaf dry mass, LDMC, C/N ratio and RII in the competition experiment.
• Supplementary Table S3. – Results of the two-way ANOVA of above-ground biomass, plant height, SLA, LNC and RII in the competition experiments.
• Supplementary Table S4. – Results of the two-way ANOVA of leaf area, leaf drymass, LDMC, C/N ratio and RII in the competition experiment.